The weight of Pluto, like other celestial bodies, is not measured directly but instead, its mass is calculated. Its mass is estimated to be 1.303×10^22 kg. However, your question might be better suited for an astronomical or space-focused forum as this site is dedicated to programming questions and discussions.

The weight of the Earth is not typically calculated because weight depends on the force of gravity acting against a mass. Instead, scientists use the concept of mass. The mass of the Earth is approximately 5.972 × 10^24 kg. However, if we still want to describe this in terms of weight, we can consider the weight of the Earth as the force with which it's pulled toward the sun. Using the average distance from the Earth to the Sun and the gravitational constant, the weight of the Earth is around 3.54 x 10^22 Newton. Keep in mind, the weight of the Earth is generally not a relevant measurement in most circumstances, particularly not in programming. Instead, you might be interested in working with the concept of gravity when dealing with physics simulations or game development.

GPT-4 is truly a massive model, as you've gleaned from the leaked details. It has about 1.8 trillion parameters across 120 layers. The model's enormous size is due to a strategy called Mixture of Experts (MoE), with 16 experts each accounting for approximately 111B parameters. Also, there's about ~55B shared parameters for attention.

Despite its huge size, only about ~280B parameters and ~560 TFLOPs are utilized in each forward pass inference due to the MoE strategy. Its training data consisted of around 13T tokens, which include both text and code-based data. The context length for pre-training was 8K, but for the 32k version, it was based on fine-tuning post pre-training.

OpenAI has used a mixture of tensor and pipeline parallelism to train it over an array of A100s GPU. An estimate of the training cost comes to about $63 million, assuming an hourly cloud cost of $1 per A100. One of the trade-offs with MoE is that it's hard to leverage during inference as not every part of the model is used during every token generation.

There are other features of the GPT-4 model like multi-query attention, speculative decoding, etc. that help with reducing the memory need. But even with these, the hardware requirements for running the model are quite high. The inference runs on a cluster of 128 GPUs.

The training data is also diverse, with most of it likely comprised of online text data from a wide array of sources. It includes text data from CommonCrawl and RefinedWeb, and probably from sources like twitter, reddit, YouTube, college textbooks and other publicly available data on the internet.

So, GPT-4's size and the resources required to operate and manage it are substantial. Nevertheless, its potential in various applications makes these efforts worthwhile.

The 100 prisoners problem is actually a problem of strategy under certain conditions, primarily featuring randomness and communication constraints. This problem is more closely related to the field of information theory, probability, or game theory than to the field of data search algorithms. Let's briefly describe critical aspects of both fields to clarify.

The 100 prisoners problem: The main approach of the problem is to use randomness, a specific visitation strategy, and a covert communication method to increase the chances from almost nil to nearly certain for all prisoners to find their own number in the draw box.

A data search algorithm: Its purpose is to find one item in a data set. This can involve searching through this data set in various ways, such as linear search (checking each element), binary search (halving the data each time), or other methods depending on the data structure. Efficiency is typically paramount in these algorithms to reduce computational time.

How these are different: While both involve "searching," the context, constraints, and goals are entirely different. A data search is deterministic, and there is no randomness or covert communication involved. Both the process and the outcome are predictable, given the same data set and algorithm.

Furthermore, the "100 prisoners" approach wouldn't usually speed up a data search. Applying it to such a search implies randomly selecting your data points, which can potentially lead to worse results than a linear search, where every data point is tested systematically.

In short, while it's great to think outside the box, understanding the nuances and requirements of different problems will allow you to apply the best solutions. The 100 prisoners problem and data search algorithms are fields with differing goals and constraints and thus require different approaches and solutions.

Tesla's decision to omit LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) from its Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology is a heavily debated topic in the automotive and tech industry. This strategy is primarily based on a couple of reasons:

1. Cost-Effectiveness: LiDAR is expensive compared to cameras and radars, which Tesla uses overwhelmingly. Making self-driving technology accessible and affordable is a key part of Tesla's mission.

2. Reliability on Visual Inputs: Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, firmly believes that the real world is primarily visually navigated, and hence asserts that autonomous vehicles should be engineered to rely heavily on visual inputs, much like humans do. Tesla's FSD tech thus heavily relies on its advanced neural network and computer vision system.

3. Software Advancements: Tesla is focusing on developing advanced AI and machine learning techniques to interpret visual data effectively, mimicking human-like driving.

4. Data Collection: With close to a million Teslas on the road, each one collecting data, Tesla has a significant advantage in terms of data volume for training their neural networks.

However, this decision doesn't come without risks:

1. Limitations of Camera Systems: Inclement weather and low light conditions can compromise the effectiveness of camera-based systems, areas where LIDAR excels.

2. Dependence on AI: The success of Tesla's approach heavily relies on their ability to continually improve their machine learning algorithms.

Most vehicle manufacturers use a combination of cameras, radar, ultrasound, and LiDAR for their autonomous vehicle systems. Hence, whether Tesla's bet on camera and radar-based system is smart or not largely depends on how effective their AI software becomes at analyzing real-world driving scenarios without the need for LiDAR. It’s also important to note that technology, and regulatory acceptance of this technology, are both still in development and subject to change.

Starting a complex project like a driving game in Unity can seem daunting, but here's a simple approach to get rolling:

1. **Learn Unity Basics**: Begin with getting acquainted with Unity’s interface and basic functionalities. The [official Unity tutorials](https://learn.unity.com/) are a great starting point.

2. **Get to Know C#**: Unity uses C# as its main scripting language. If you don't know C# yet, there are numerous online resources like [Codecademy](https://www.codecademy.com/learn/learn-c-sharp) that can help.

3. **Vehicle Physics**: Study Unity's built-in vehicle assets. Learn how to import and use them in your game.

4. **Environment Design**: Learn about Unity’s Terrain System for designing your game environment. You may also consider using asset packs from the Unity Asset Store to speed this up.

5. **Programming Game Mechanics**: This includes learning how to handle user input to control the vehicle, detecting collisions, setting up a HUD, setting boundaries, checkpoints and even basic AI for traffic etc.

6. **Learn About Game Design**: This includes level creation, designing gameplay mechanics, narrative etc. Unity Learn has numerous resources on these as well.

7. **Iterative Testing**: Build and test your game repeatedly during the development process. This will allow you to catch and fix issues as they arise.

Since the scope of a project like this is huge, remember to start small. Create a prototype focusing on the main mechanic (driving) and then slowly add other features. The Unity Community is also a great resource when you're stuck or to gain insights from experienced developers. Good luck!

Here's a simple example of a Fibonacci function in C using recursion:

```c
#include

int fibonacci(int n) {
if(n <= 1) {
return n;
}
return fibonacci(n - 1) + fibonacci(n - 2);
}

int main() {
int n = 10;
printf("Fibonacci number %d is: %d\n", n, fibonacci(n));
return 0;
}
```
In the function `fibonacci()`, we calculate the nth Fibonacci number recursively. The base condition for this recursion is if `n` is less than or equal to 1, in which case `n` is returned as it is since the first two Fibonacci numbers are 0 and 1 respectively. If `n` is greater than 1, we get the nth Fibonacci number by summing up the (n-1)th and (n-2)th Fibonacci numbers recursively.

This recursive implementation is simple and works well for small values of `n`. It is derived directly from the mathematical definition of Fibonacci numbers. However, for larger values of `n`, it has significant performance issues due to repeated calculations of the same sub-problems.

For large `n`, an iterative approach or the use of dynamic programming could be more efficient which avoid re-computation by storing the calculated values.

Here's an example of iterative approach:

```c
#include

int fibonacci_iter(int n) {
if (n <= 1) {
return n;
}
int fib = 1, prev_fib = 1;
for (int i = 2; i < n; i++) {
int temp = fib;
fib += prev_fib;
prev_fib = temp;
}
return fib;
}

int main() {
int n = 10;
printf("Fibonacci number %d is: %d\n", n, fibonacci_iter(n));
return 0;
}
```
The time complexity for this solution is O(n), which is more optimal than the previous solution with a time complexity of O(2^n).

Every problem has its own suitable solution. In programming, always consider the trade-offs before choosing an algorithm.

test answer